News
Guest editorial on Cobell vs. Salazar
AS PUBLISHED IN THE BOZEMAN DAILY CHRONICLE ON JANUARY 25, 2010
At
the close of 2009, I was pleased to see resolution of a nearly invisible but
monumental problem facing America’s first, and one of its most disadvantaged,
populations. Cobell vs. Salazar, a
lawsuit initiated 14 years ago by Elouise Cobell, a Blackfeet tribal member, community
leader and former treasurer of the Blackfeet Nation, was settled, an important
step toward righting injustices perpetuated for more than a century.
Private
ownership of land was virtually unknown in American Indian culture. U.S. government-sanctioned
expansion westward was framed in part by the notion that the “Indian problem”
was best dealt with by introducing “among the Indians the customs and pursuits
of civilized life and gradually absorb them into the mass of our citizens” (President
Chester A. Arthur, 1884). Tribal lands
were divided into parcels ranging in size from 40 to 160 acres, with allotments
made to tribal members. Much of the
non-allotted land was sold to non-natives at rock bottom prices in one of our
nation’s greatest land grabs, with better than 89 million acres disposed of by
the government in this fashion.
The
United States was mandated, under the Dawes Act (1887), to hold allotted lands
in trust for the benefit of tribal members, managing them and investing into
individual accounts any funds received. Numerous
studies have documented ineptitude and corruption in the management of those
funds. Few if any of the beneficiaries
have been provided with adequate information about their funds, or have been
able to realize any monies from the accounts.
What
was initially a 25-year trust evolved into perpetuity, rather than giving
tribal members outright ownership when the 25 years expired. What failed to evolve was any system of
inheritance. As original “owners” passed
on, ownership interests passed on to all heirs in equal undivided shares (wills
were uncommon on reservations). A 40
acre allotment in 1890 could now have more than 100 owners. For each new owner, a new trust account would
have to be established. As early as
1922, a report from the General Accounting Office (GAO) found that for 80,000
established parcels, there were at least a million associated ownership
interests.
Red
Feather Development Group works with reservation communities, building energy-efficient
homes and training community groups in construction and community development.
When we began our work in 1995, we learned about the complicated land issues
the hard way. A prospective homeowner
might need 100 relatives, some impossible to locate, to sign off on a parcel
before she could build a home. With
these encumbrances, financing for home construction was difficult, if not
impossible, to obtain. According to a
recent article in Indian Country Today,
the GAO could only find a record of 97 mortgages extended on the 300+
reservations around the country from 1992 to 1996. During 2009, 258 mortgages are documented, but
in the face of a need for 200,000 housing units on reservations, the
improvement in financing options is insignificant.
Ms.
Cobell’s motivation for settlement was that the class of beneficiaries was
diminishing as elders died. Funds from a
settlement could make a dramatic difference to families living in the most
abject poverty. The court settlement
will achieve three principal objectives:
1.
Establishment
of a fund for scholarships for higher education for Indian youth
2.
Funding
of individual accounts to compensate in part for the generations of funds
mismanaged by the U.S. government
3.
Funding
to resolve the problem of fractionated land interests
In terms of addressing the need for adequate housing in reservation communities, I realize the settlement will not cure all ills, but it is a symbolic recognition of the injustices done to tribal members over generations and brings much-needed attention to the land problems. I congratulate Ms. Cobell on her persistent search for justice, and hope this settlement heralds a brighter day, when every American can realize that basic human right of a decent, safe, affordable home.
WRITTEN BY ROBERT O. YOUNG, FOUNDER AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF RED FEATHER DEVELOPMENT GROUP
